Re: SGA Sizing problem
From: Michael Marsden <mmarsden_at_netcom.com>
Date: 1995/08/19
Message-ID: <mmarsdenDDKr8C.496_at_netcom.com>#1/1
Date: 1995/08/19
Message-ID: <mmarsdenDDKr8C.496_at_netcom.com>#1/1
: Thomas J Kyte (tkyte_at_us.oracle.com) wrote:
: > parris_at_walleye.esp.bellcore.com (Parris Geiser) wrote:
: > >db_block_buffers = 100
: > >shared_pool = 3,500,000
: > >log_buffer = 16,384
: > >block_size = 2048.
: > >So, the SGA should be: 3,721,184.
: > >But when I do an ipcs -b -m
: > >I get 4,892,680.
: > >The question is: why such a large descrepency?????
: > > Thanks.
: > The variables you listed have by far the largest effect on the SGA size but they
: > are not the only things up there.
: > Thomas Kyte
: > tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
: > Oracle Government