Re: v6->v7 Executable size increase
Date: 1995/08/08
Message-ID: <408mtl$ekg_at_news4.digex.net>#1/1
Tommy Wareing (p0070621_at_brookes.ac.uk) wrote:
: I know this has been mentioned before, but I'm afraid I never paid attention,
: as it wasn't relevant to me at the time... :(
: Anyone know how I get my PRO*C executables back down to the 640k size that
: they used to be until we upgraded to v7 (PRO*C v2.0)?
: (They're now around 4.5 Mbytes, which is a bit sad for something with only
: one select statement).
: --
You don't mention what platform you're on, but depending on whether you can use shared libraries or not you may be stuck.
If you can't use shared libs, make sure that Oracle is only linking with the libraries it needs. However, they did combine a lot of libs together making even the simplest programs huge (on HP/UX, we have several that went from 200-400k to 1.5MB and higher).
Joe
: _________________________ __________________________________________
: / Tommy Wareing \ / I've been looking for an original sin, \
: | p0070621_at_brookes.ac.uk X One with a twist and a bit of a spin |
: \ 0865-483389 / \ -- Pandora's Box, Jim Steinman /
: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
=------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Joe Nardone |
joe_at_access.digex.net |
Received on Tue Aug 08 1995 - 00:00:00 CEST