Q: SQL*Loader Performance
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 18:11:38 GMT
Message-ID: <D5r3vF.ArH_at_cs.dal.ca>
I hope somebody can explain this one as my VAX system administrator and I are very confused.
I have two completely seperate Oracle databases / instances (RDBMS 7.0.16) running on a VAX 6620 (VMS 5.5). If I run a SQL*Loader job (loading 260,000 rows) while both databases are up and running, the load uses less CPU and clock time than when *only* the database that is being loaded is up and running!
To test this, I took the second database down and ran the load during a very quiet time (no other user or batch job running). The job took more time (CPU and clock) than when I ran the load during normal to light activity and both databases / instances running.
With both databases up and running, I get the following statistics:
Elapsed time was : 00:29:44.19 CPU time was: 00:16:26.82
With only one database up and running, my statistics are:
Elapsed time was: 00:41:00.58 CPU time was: 00:38:34.95
What gives? Any thoughts, theories, facts, or otherwise are greatly appreciated.
-- Murray Kaiser | Usual gutless disclaimer.. Nova Scotia Power | Opinions are mine and not necessarily (Murray.Kaiser_at_NSPower.NS.CA) | shared by my employerReceived on Mon Mar 20 1995 - 19:11:38 CET