Re: Oracle Performance on HP vs Sun ?
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 94 15:50:40 -0500
Message-ID: <9403031550.PN13647_at_LL.MIT.EDU>
In article <CM08JA.BAo_at_ses11.shpk.ses.com> brada_at_ses21.sesinc.com (Brad Albom) writes:
>From: brada_at_ses21.sesinc.com (Brad Albom)
>Subject: Oracle Performance on HP vs Sun ?
>Keywords: Oracle, HP, Sun
>Date: Tue, 1 Mar 1994 21:18:45 GMT
>I realize that the HP 9000/800 E35's have recently
>come out, but has anyone done any Oracle performance
>comparisons between these boxes and say Sparcstation-10
>Model 51's. Would there even be a noticeable difference
>in terms of running with multiple, relatively small databases
>(eg. 6 to 10 tables with less than 10,000 rows each).
>Is either platform particularly good for running Oracle
>(and/or Sybase) ?
>Also, it would be useful to have info on the relative ease
>of admin (if there's any difference at all) across platforms.
>I've heard that normal Unix admin on the HP's is highly
>non-standard (i.e. unique to HP machines) as performed through
>a tool called SAM. Is this true ? Any other war stories or
>experiences (positive or negative) would be appreciated.
>TIA,
>-brad albom
>Software Engineering Solutions, Inc
>2685 Marine Way, Suite 1215, Mountain View, CA 94043
>Voice: (415) 969-0141
>Fax : (415) 969-0177
>Email: brada_at_sesinc.com
My intuitive exerience with the HP vs. Sun Oracle debate would be that HP kicks the Sun Machines Butt!!!
-jf Received on Thu Mar 03 1994 - 21:50:40 CET