SQR - Good Idea?
From: John Dennis <jdennis_at_eng.gtefsd.com>
Date: 8 May 1993 20:47:04 GMT
Message-ID: <1sh688$ti1_at_europa.eng.gtefsd.com>
| jdennis_at_sun06.mtgy.gtegsc.com | |
| | "HAPPY, HAPPY |
| | JOY, JOY!" |
| Montgomery, AL | Stimpy |
Received on Sat May 08 1993 - 22:47:04 CEST
Date: 8 May 1993 20:47:04 GMT
Message-ID: <1sh688$ti1_at_europa.eng.gtefsd.com>
I'm currently looking at SQR (using ESQR too) to replace our current report writer. Is there any major design flaws, bugs that might influence such a decision? Also, any major features or user-friendly would be helpful. Basically, I'm leaning toward getting SQR but I need to justify it.
As side note: Has anyone used ESQR to provide "Ad-hoc" queries.
Thanks for any of your time and insight,
John Dennis
| jdennis_at_sun06.mtgy.gtegsc.com | |
| | "HAPPY, HAPPY |
| | JOY, JOY!" |
| Montgomery, AL | Stimpy |
Received on Sat May 08 1993 - 22:47:04 CEST