Re: Code in the database or middle tier (the CLR controversy)
From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 16:08:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1118012928.398487_at_yasure>
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 16:08:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1118012928.398487_at_yasure>
Erland Sommarskog wrote:
> Microsoft has in my opinion a quite elegant take on this: you can run a
> database in compatibility mode for an earlier version. This permits
> MS to drop support or to make incompatible changes in order to improve
> things, but still makes it possible for people to migrate.
[Quoted] I'm not sure I'd use the phrase "quite elegant" as it is just a copy of functionality available in all commercial RDBMS products.
For example Oracle, in its init.ora (now compilable as the spfile), has a parameter called compatible that can be set to a wide range of previous versions. That parameter has existed longer than SQL Server.
-- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)Received on Mon Jun 06 2005 - 01:08:33 CEST