Re: Connection tunneling
From: Ronald Rood <devnull_at_ronr.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 06:08:54 +0200
Message-ID: <0001HW.BD23B8F6004F15E2F03055B0_at_news.individual.net>
> need
> WS
> having a
> lan
> (...)
>
> WS is Windows XP PC - is it any problem. As I know (not sure), SSH is only
> or UNIX, isn't it?
>
> KasztelaNn
>
>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 06:08:54 +0200
Message-ID: <0001HW.BD23B8F6004F15E2F03055B0_at_news.individual.net>
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:04:00 +0200, monisiatko wrote (in article <cdju3v$jdh$1_at_nemesis.news.tpi.pl>):
>> It still looks possible using ssh tunnels. Try to make a ssh tunnel that >> connects C2 and WS and one that connects C2 and S. The local ports on C2
> need
>> to be the same (output port -> listen port). Doing so enables access from
> WS
[Quoted] >> to S using a tunnel over C2. >> On this very moment I am connected to a database running inside a LAN
> having a
>> non routeble ip address using a tunnel over a machine that is behind a nat >> firewall. It looks a bit the same. ( I am working on a machine in an other
> lan
[Quoted] >> where I have a private IP that is also not routeble over the internet) >> see:
> (...)
>
> WS is Windows XP PC - is it any problem. As I know (not sure), SSH is only
> or UNIX, isn't it?
>
> KasztelaNn
>
>
A little googling will show windows ssh solutions. Unix/linux/macosX would make things easier but it can be done using windows too.
-- With kind regards, Ronald http://ronr.nl/unix-dbaReceived on Wed Jul 21 2004 - 06:08:54 CEST