Re: Oracle client for DOS
From: Joel Garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: 20 Apr 2004 13:49:15 -0700
Message-ID: <91884734.0404201249.31a5f40d_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 20 Apr 2004 13:49:15 -0700
Message-ID: <91884734.0404201249.31a5f40d_at_posting.google.com>
ed.prochak_at_magicinterface.com (Ed prochak) wrote in message news:<4b5394b2.0404190951.3f6cf42a_at_posting.google.com>...
> "Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message news:<408388fb$0$16964$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...
> >
> While I agree that upgrading the machines should be seriously
> considered, Linux might not be a possible solution. LINUX assumes at
> least a 32bit processor and that might not be available on machines
> that are not even running MS Windows.
Some linux assume much more than that, redhat 7 and up reject my AMD K6-300 which runs 98SE just fine, or as fine as 98 ever is. Of course, _real_ programmers would fix the snakey install and _make_ it work.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. If The Rock went to church, would the priest say "Rock, mi amo deus!" Falco!Received on Tue Apr 20 2004 - 22:49:15 CEST