Re: Article about supposed "murky" future for Oracle
From: Greg Forestieri <gforestieri9_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 25 Mar 2004 04:26:17 -0800
Message-ID: <6a8cdd95.0403250426.6bad2668_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 25 Mar 2004 04:26:17 -0800
Message-ID: <6a8cdd95.0403250426.6bad2668_at_posting.google.com>
Ron <fdf_at_dmb.no> wrote in message news:<1064ungbvq55jd0_at_news.supernews.com>...
> I found an interesting article by Karen Southwick about Oracle's
> supposed "murky" (in her own words) future. Can someone counter her
> arguments.
>
> http://news.com.com/2010-1071-5072299.html
>
> Should I select Oracle or should I go with
>
> PostgreSQL.com (free and in my opinion, extremely reliable), MYSQL, MS
> SQL Server or DB2?
>
> Thanks!
It's a bit early to let someone guessing about the future determine which product to purchase. Let's just say at very least you have to strongly consider Oracle. In many situations it is the no-brainer choice. Received on Thu Mar 25 2004 - 13:26:17 CET