Re: Vote tally for period FAQ posting

Niall Litchfield wrote:
>
> "Hans Forbrich" <cdo_ng_cfv_at_telus.net> wrote in message
> news:4015E1F1.2CC3B22C_at_telus.net...
> > (Apologies for the cross post.)
> >
> > The response to the call for votes around the periodic FAQ post has been
> > underwhelming, as can be seen below. I'm not quite sure how to
> > interpret the results. (For the sake of amusement, 3 were incorrectly
> > addressed and one could not be verified.)
> <snip>
>
> I think I'd interpret the level of response as reflecting the level of
> interest in doing anything about the issues you raised. In other words
> probably don't bother...
>

I didn't raise the issue - I just responded with the proposal.

Let the whining continue? Received on Tue Jan 27 2004 - 18:48:03 CET