Re: Hardware Recommendations

From: Barbara Kennedy <barbken_at_teleport.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 11:07:26 -0700
Message-ID: <e6Vn5.4911$Pi.212054_at_nntp3.onemain.com>


Also given thread limitations in NT you would have to use MTS. At that load level I would go with UNIX, more stable more scalable. You have a lot of homework to do - how much IO are you going to need, is it OLTP or OLAP or what. Are you using bind variables? (hope so). Etc. Jim
"MyTwoBits" <nighr_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:PjIn5.10820$ZI2.512096_at_news1.rdc1.il.home.com...
> You might want to consider MTS. If you allocate 1MB of RAM to
> SORT_AREA_SIZE, you will need just 1.5 GB for this parameter. The Oracle
> default setting of 64k has always been a little too low.
>
> Personally I wouldn't put over 100 connections to an NT server. Call me
> biased, but I would be more comfortable with Unix. Any version. Even
 then
> I would think about 4 processors. If you need 6 or 8 processors, Unix is
> the only way to go.
>
> It really depends on your application. You would have to know more than
 the
> total number of users. Do you have batch processing requirements? How
 much
> disk will your application need?
>
> --My25/c.
>
> "Jason Rigsbee" <jrigsbee_at_rigsbee.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:eID#EJhAAHA.358_at_cpmsnbbsa07...
> > What kind of hardware do I need to purchase (RAM, HD, Processor, etc.)
 to
> > run an Oracle database that will have 1500 simultaneous connections
 running
> > Windows 2000 (preferred) or Windows NT 4.0?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > jlr
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sun Aug 20 2000 - 20:07:26 CEST

Original text of this message