Re: Oracle and Veritas

From: Philip Brown <phil+s3_at_bolthole.no-bots.com>
Date: 10 Oct 1999 19:00:00 GMT
Message-Id: <slrn801ohg.jvt.phil+s3_at_shell3.ba.best.com>


On Sun, 10 Oct 1999 12:39:35 -0500, encephal_at_chorus.net wrote:
>> > The database edition really improves Direct (ie, synchronous) I/O access
>> > for the database.
>
>> Is this still true? I thought Solaris 2.6 had changes to the UFS file
>> system to make databases on partitions almost as fast as raw devices?
>
> Sun's UFS+ with logging, direct I/O, etc will probably be pretty
>slow in comparison.

[Quoted] you are assuming he was refering to logging. [Quoted] He was not. It should be obvious that ufs logging should NOT be turned on for filesystems that have databases on them. That's what the database transaction log is for.

[Quoted] The only database-related filesytem improvement I'm aware of, is the "forcedirectio" option or someting.

-- 
[Trim the no-bots from my address to reply to me by email!]
[ Do NOT email-CC me on posts. Pick one or the other.]
       http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d105:SN01618:_at_@@D
The word of the day is mispergitude
Received on Sun Oct 10 1999 - 21:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message