Re: Forms 3 rearing it's ugly head......

From: TurkBear <johng_at_mm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 19:08:07 GMT
Message-ID: <356f06b3.3355054_at_news2.mm.com>


I believe one of the problems is that there is no way to force a 4-digit year format - users can enter 2 digit years and, depending on your database setup, this mu-ight be misinterpreted....

Please check Oracle's site for full Y2K details on their products... www.oracle.com/year2000

Martin Anderson <mhanders_at_bbn.com> wrote:

>Hello all,
>
>I am stuck on a Y2K project that uses Oracle 7.1.6.2.0. and Forms 3. I
>understand that this version of Forms is NOT Y2K compliant. Could
>someone explain to me what makes Forms 3 non-compliant? That way I have
>a better understanding of what to look for when I am scanning the source
>code for possible problems.
>
>Thanks, Martin
>
Received on Fri May 29 1998 - 21:08:07 CEST

Original text of this message