Re: Test Message
From: Eric <eric_at_deptj.eu>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:16:21 +0000
Message-ID: <slrnjjsa7l.2pe.eric_at_teckel.deptj.eu>
On 2012-02-17, onedbguru <onedbguru_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 2012-02-16, Kay Kanekowski <kay.kanekow..._at_web.de> wrote:
>>
>> > On 16 Feb., 00:59, Eric <e..._at_deptj.eu> wrote:
>> >> You have seen a cancelled message!
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > your message isn't really cancelled
>>
>> > Kay
>>
>> Why do you say that?
>>
> if it were cancelled you would not see it. Therefore because we DO see > it, it is not cancelled.
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:16:21 +0000
Message-ID: <slrnjjsa7l.2pe.eric_at_teckel.deptj.eu>
On 2012-02-17, onedbguru <onedbguru_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2:46?am, Eric <e..._at_deptj.eu> wrote:
>> On 2012-02-16, Kay Kanekowski <kay.kanekow..._at_web.de> wrote:
>>
>> > On 16 Feb., 00:59, Eric <e..._at_deptj.eu> wrote:
>> >> You have seen a cancelled message!
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > your message isn't really cancelled
>>
>> > Kay
>>
>> Why do you say that?
>>
> if it were cancelled you would not see it. Therefore because we DO see > it, it is not cancelled.
Not true. Cancels tend to be ignored, which was the whole point of the exercise.
Eric
-- ms fnd in a lbryReceived on Fri Feb 17 2012 - 04:16:21 CST