Re: Test Message
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:21:49 +1100
Message-ID: <jho1kf$hv9$1_at_dont-email.me>
Eric wrote,on my timestamp of 17/02/2012 9:16 PM:
>>>
>>> Why do you say that?
>>>
>> if it were cancelled you would not see it. Therefore because we DO see
>> it, it is not cancelled.
>
> Not true. Cancels tend to be ignored, which was the whole point of the
> exercise.
>
> Eric
>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:21:49 +1100
Message-ID: <jho1kf$hv9$1_at_dont-email.me>
Eric wrote,on my timestamp of 17/02/2012 9:16 PM:
>>>
>>> Why do you say that?
>>>
>> if it were cancelled you would not see it. Therefore because we DO see
>> it, it is not cancelled.
>
> Not true. Cancels tend to be ignored, which was the whole point of the
> exercise.
>
> Eric
>
Can you perceive the difference between "tend" and "are"?
No? Forget it then.
No use arguing anything else...
Received on Sat Feb 18 2012 - 05:21:49 CST