Re: Ooooops!....

From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <71c433cf-ddf7-4c68-a738-14cd24f1a45e_at_y6g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>



On Dec 5, 3:34 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:20:53 -0800, Noons wrote:
> > Apparently this went quietly unnoticed?
> >http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-adobe-cuts-flash-
>
> development-conceding-to-apple-20111109,0,693803.story
>
> > I'll bet that "strategic investment" in flash technology for MOS is
> > looking pretty much silly and infantile now, eh?
> > Never mind, Lazza will buy the company and make the crap last longer
> > just like he did with sun and java.
> > Yes: I despise both of those technologies, any prob with that?
>
> You forgot XML. That is also a piece of ... something.
>

XML is perfectly fine for what it was designed for, a simple markup language. The crap is from misusing it far beyond that, like using it as a database language, trying to force a schema on it, or is it the other way around?

I'm still wondering about the errors browsers get looking at the XE alert log. "Cannot view xml input using xsl style sheet...Only one top level element allowed in an xml document".

jg

--
_at_home.com is bogus.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/dec/05/qualcomm-diving-deeper-wireless-health-care/
Received on Tue Dec 06 2011 - 11:45:34 CST

Original text of this message