Re: ASM for single-instance 11g db server?
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 00:43:42 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2011.04.05.00.41.23_at_gmail.com>
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 22:07:42 +0200, Robert Klemme wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 00:43:42 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2011.04.05.00.41.23_at_gmail.com>
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 22:07:42 +0200, Robert Klemme wrote:
> Well, that would get rid of the OS level caching but not the file system
> overhead (managing inodes, blocks etc.).
That's no too bad, especially if the FS is mounted with the noatime option, so that OS doesn't maintain the time of the last access. My experience with direct I/O is that the access is almost as fast as the access to raw devices. I didn't see much of a difference.
-- http://mgogala.byethost5.comReceived on Mon Apr 04 2011 - 19:43:42 CDT