Re: known bugs in 10.2.0.1 on aix 64bit
From: Gerard H. Pille <ghp_at_skynet.be>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:37:41 +0200
Message-ID: <4c8fdd15$0$5304$ba620e4c_at_news.skynet.be>
joel garry wrote:
>
> You'd run less risk on the recent versions than on the unpatched
> version IMO, but there are still ASSM bugs. If you google assm
> jonathan lewis you'll perhaps find posts about 10.2.0.4. Talk to
> support about what you've found and see what they say. My guess is
> these performance bugs mostly show up with high concurrency
> situations, or the specific cases people like Charles Hooper have
> posted about. I ran into one performance situation, made a note to
> myself to investigate a one-off patch, then forgot about it until you
> just reminded me. Corruption does tend to be more noticeable.
>
> jg
> --
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:37:41 +0200
Message-ID: <4c8fdd15$0$5304$ba620e4c_at_news.skynet.be>
joel garry wrote:
>
> You'd run less risk on the recent versions than on the unpatched
> version IMO, but there are still ASSM bugs. If you google assm
> jonathan lewis you'll perhaps find posts about 10.2.0.4. Talk to
> support about what you've found and see what they say. My guess is
> these performance bugs mostly show up with high concurrency
> situations, or the specific cases people like Charles Hooper have
> posted about. I ran into one performance situation, made a note to
> myself to investigate a one-off patch, then forgot about it until you
> just reminded me. Corruption does tend to be more noticeable.
>
> jg
> --
Drop ASSM altogether? Received on Tue Sep 14 2010 - 15:37:41 CDT