Re: known bugs in 10.2.0.1 on aix 64bit
From: John Hurley <hurleyjohnb_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <cbf451c4-be6e-464d-a2dc-cc63b6ad0b84_at_q18g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 14, 2:11 pm, "Gerard H. Pille" <g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
> Can someone tell me about a bug in 10.2.0.1, which would cause excessive undo with heavy dml on
> ASSM tablespaces? I found mention of this bug in a post dating back to 2006, but no number.
>
> I think this bug would be a good reason for upgrading, an application used by my employer does
> excessive dml, and until today, I didn't realize a more recent version could provide better
> performance.
>
> Any other reasons for leaving 10.2.0.1 behind are also very welcome. Should we go for 10.2.0.4
> or 10.2.0.5 immediately?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gerard
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <cbf451c4-be6e-464d-a2dc-cc63b6ad0b84_at_q18g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 14, 2:11 pm, "Gerard H. Pille" <g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
> Can someone tell me about a bug in 10.2.0.1, which would cause excessive undo with heavy dml on
> ASSM tablespaces? I found mention of this bug in a post dating back to 2006, but no number.
>
> I think this bug would be a good reason for upgrading, an application used by my employer does
> excessive dml, and until today, I didn't realize a more recent version could provide better
> performance.
>
> Any other reasons for leaving 10.2.0.1 behind are also very welcome. Should we go for 10.2.0.4
> or 10.2.0.5 immediately?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gerard
10.2.0.1? Really?
I just have on 10.2 system left but it is over on solaris and ( not used heavily ) and stable on 10.2.0.4.
I would think you want to look at 10.2.0.5 and research bugs on that port to aix. Received on Tue Sep 14 2010 - 18:22:31 CDT