Re: Oracle does it again

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:39:50 +0100
Message-ID: <7v2n0mFrq5U3_at_mid.individual.net>



On 28.02.2010 02:25, Mark D Powell wrote:
> On Feb 27, 7:29 pm, John Hurley <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> On Feb 27, 6:34 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> snip
>>
>>> On the other hand, we are considering moving our central oracle DB to
>>> version 11g. There are several features that appeal to us. This project
>>> was to establish how hard would it be to upgrade from Oracle 10.2.0.4 to
>>> Oracle 11.2.0.1. So far, the result is a sheer disaster and I advised my
>>> CIO to wait for the next version.
>> All my systems ( except one ... running 10.2.0.4 on solaris ) are
>> running now on 11.1.0.7.1 ( linux ) and stable.
>>
>> No RAC anywhere.

>
> Is scan associated with Grid Control or another feature? If it is
> Grid Control you might want to check the following as it seems to
> indicate that 5 IP addresses are required. I would hate for you to
> have to ask for one IP and then have to right back and ask for
> another.
>
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e10813/chklist.htm#sthref96
>
> I have a friend who I am pretty sure runs 11g RAC on Linux and the
> last I talked to him his site is not experiencing any RAC related
> problems. From what I have heard 11g RAC is no worse, problem wise,
> than 10g RAC or 9.2 RAC.

How did he set up the system? IIRC Mladen's problems were mainly with upgrading 10 to 11 - not so much running 11 or installing from scratch.

Kind regards

        robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
Received on Mon Mar 01 2010 - 14:39:50 CST

Original text of this message