Re: Oracle 11g r2 one node RAC
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <38016836-c59e-492a-b60d-3267c1cd0394_at_m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
On Dec 31, 12:34 pm, Serge Rielau <srie..._at_ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 12:10 PM, joel garry wrote:
>
> > On Dec 30, 7:12 pm, Serge Rielau<srie..._at_ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> • Increases the benefit of
> >>>>>> Oracle VM with the high
> >>>>>> availability and scalability of
> >>>>>> Oracle RAC
> >>>>> How many sites out there are running production RAC dbs in a virtual
> >>>>> environment? Last time I asked back in mid2009, I got no answer...
>
> >>>> Yeah, it's like how many DB2 environments are running 32000 linux
> >>>> images.
> >>> ROFL!
> >>> Couldn't have said it better!
>
> >> I know it's not funny when a joke has to be explained.. but what the
> >> heck was that all about?
>
> > Just a cheap shot, Serge. You can find a zillion references on the
> > web to z-whatever systems, and the news at some point picked up on
> > someone running large numbers of linux images just to show it could be
> > done. Then taking a sarcastic leap of marketing-will-always-
> > exaggerate faith.
>
> I did wonder whether Noons intended to say mainframe instead of DB2.
> That was the only way I could resolve the puzzle...
>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <38016836-c59e-492a-b60d-3267c1cd0394_at_m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
On Dec 31, 12:34 pm, Serge Rielau <srie..._at_ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 12:10 PM, joel garry wrote:
>
> > On Dec 30, 7:12 pm, Serge Rielau<srie..._at_ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> • Increases the benefit of
> >>>>>> Oracle VM with the high
> >>>>>> availability and scalability of
> >>>>>> Oracle RAC
> >>>>> How many sites out there are running production RAC dbs in a virtual
> >>>>> environment? Last time I asked back in mid2009, I got no answer...
>
> >>>> Yeah, it's like how many DB2 environments are running 32000 linux
> >>>> images.
> >>> ROFL!
> >>> Couldn't have said it better!
>
> >> I know it's not funny when a joke has to be explained.. but what the
> >> heck was that all about?
>
> > Just a cheap shot, Serge. You can find a zillion references on the
> > web to z-whatever systems, and the news at some point picked up on
> > someone running large numbers of linux images just to show it could be
> > done. Then taking a sarcastic leap of marketing-will-always-
> > exaggerate faith.
>
> I did wonder whether Noons intended to say mainframe instead of DB2.
> That was the only way I could resolve the puzzle...
>
That was me goof, sorry! I should've said sites rather than environments. I can only plead end-of-year workload, and not properly proofing a silly usenet post.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/dec/31/internet-writer-to-challenge-tsa-subpoena-in-court/Received on Thu Dec 31 2009 - 16:31:09 CST