Re: Upgrading to 10.2.0.4 from 10.2.0.3
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f7a91b23-740f-41de-94f9-a443024d8553_at_u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
On Nov 6, 3:41 pm, jhavero <jhav..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> My Oracle Database Server is running 10.2.0.3.0. I would like to
> upgrade to 10.2.0.4.x When I check metalink the patch sets for
> 10.2.0.4 says it must be applied to a database already running
> 10.2.0.4. Am I reading this correctly? Which patch set do I use?
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f7a91b23-740f-41de-94f9-a443024d8553_at_u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
On Nov 6, 3:41 pm, jhavero <jhav..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> My Oracle Database Server is running 10.2.0.3.0. I would like to
> upgrade to 10.2.0.4.x When I check metalink the patch sets for
> 10.2.0.4 says it must be applied to a database already running
> 10.2.0.4. Am I reading this correctly? Which patch set do I use?
What are you looking at, exactly?
The patch set depends. For me it's 6810189
Personally, I found issues with TZ (as the fix extends beyond Oracle) and dbconsole components. YMMV.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. From the people who make spam palatable: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/transparency-choice-and-control-now.htmlReceived on Fri Nov 06 2009 - 18:33:14 CST