Re: Experience with setting _kgl_latch_count > 31

"Michel Cadot" <micadot{at}altern{dot}org> wrote in message news:4a8bbc08$0$31117$426a74cc_at_news.free.fr...
>
> "ca111026" <ca111026_at_gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 17c7e53f-cd15-4b2c-9bb5-f0d9ed5e1777_at_b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
> | Would you be able to share real-life experience with setting
> | underscore parameter
> | _kgl_version_count to value more than 31? This parameter controls
> | number of
> | child latches for library cache latch.
> |
> | It is recommend to increase the value of _kgl_latch_count if instance
> | experiences issues
> | with library cache, for example:
> |
> | http://www.ixora.com.au/q+a/library.htm
> |
> | However Metalink Note 420308.1 states that as a result of bug 5508574
> | the instance may hang if the value of parameter is more than 31.
> |
> | We are looking at increasing value of this parameter for database
> | running on
> | server with 24 CPU. Default value of the parameter is 29 (next prime
> | number after CPU count).
> |
>
> Do you see that your referenced page has 10 years old?
> Don't you think Oracle rdbms engine evolved during this time?
>
> Regards
> Michel
>

Maybe his database is 10 years old? :-) Received on Wed Aug 19 2009 - 15:42:38 CDT