Re: enforce no master without detail

From: steph <stephan0h_at_yahoo.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fa5157d7-ac55-4b03-a6db-8f938f4c43b4_at_h31g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

On 5 Aug., 13:48, Phil Herring <phil_herr..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 8:33 pm, Shakespeare <what..._at_xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> > You mean MY answer?????
>
> Settle down. I mean *my* second answer, which was crap.
>
> -- Phil

Thanks for the answers - so it won't do without a small change in datamodel. But else I like it - seems to be not much effort to implement.

About the 2nd answer: I see what you point to - once when we're at 11g I'll do some research.

regards,
stephan Received on Wed Aug 05 2009 - 08:47:58 CDT