Re: Oracle configuration related weird behaviour?
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1e5f610f-e937-470d-a0db-e646bcf58254_at_k20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 4, 5:16 am, qualit..._at_gmail.com wrote:
snip
> I have no acces to Metalink for patches.
>
> I'm using this version because we are doing maintenance tasks in an
> application running in 9.2.0.8, but we use the freely available
> version 9.2.0.1.
>
> Is there any other information source without purchaising Oracle
> support where I can see if it's a declared bug?
>
> Thank you.
Well you could test by importing into some other more fixed base release like 10.2 or 11.1?
By the way "freely available 9.2.0.1" is not exactly like that. There's a whole long list of things you agree to.
If you have a production app running in 9.2.0.8 and you are doing "serious" development/testing on that app in 9.2.0.1 to avoid paying oracle licensing well that's probably not legit. Received on Thu Jun 04 2009 - 06:32:25 CDT