Re: Oracle vs SQL Server
From: <gareth_at_jamms.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <861e5bed-70e9-4811-8604-b7dfb1d2b975_at_n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
On 15 Apr, 21:14, sybra..._at_hccnet.nl wrote:
> The best feature comparison is athttp://www.psoug.org/reference/OLD/sqlserver.html
>
> If Optivision was developed for SQLserver and has been 'ported' 1 on 1
> to Oracle, it will almost 100 percent certain perform badly, as the
> architecture of both databases is fundamentally different.
> In that case you shouldn't consider using Oracle, or you must want to
> make the life of an Oracle DBA miserable.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker
> Senior Oracle DBA
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <861e5bed-70e9-4811-8604-b7dfb1d2b975_at_n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
On 15 Apr, 21:14, sybra..._at_hccnet.nl wrote:
> The best feature comparison is athttp://www.psoug.org/reference/OLD/sqlserver.html
>
> If Optivision was developed for SQLserver and has been 'ported' 1 on 1
> to Oracle, it will almost 100 percent certain perform badly, as the
> architecture of both databases is fundamentally different.
> In that case you shouldn't consider using Oracle, or you must want to
> make the life of an Oracle DBA miserable.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker
> Senior Oracle DBA
Anyone noticed that that website is running on mySQL and appears to have crashed? :D
-g Received on Fri Apr 17 2009 - 07:39:57 CDT