Re: Logical block corruption
From: jgar the jorrible <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <06da5775-95c3-4177-bad9-e13ede30ea77_at_u9g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 1, 9:26 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:38:17 -0700, johnbhurley wrote:
> > Why don't you drop and re-create the indexes that have the problems?
>
> Or just rebuild them? AFAIK, "rebuild" was supported back then in 8i
> version, when my pet T-Rex was still alive.
>
> --http://mgogala.free hostia.com
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <06da5775-95c3-4177-bad9-e13ede30ea77_at_u9g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 1, 9:26 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:38:17 -0700, johnbhurley wrote:
> > Why don't you drop and re-create the indexes that have the problems?
>
> Or just rebuild them? AFAIK, "rebuild" was supported back then in 8i
> version, when my pet T-Rex was still alive.
>
> --http://mgogala.free hostia.com
Wouldn't that be using a corrupt index to make a new corrupt index? Or did I miss a joke?
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/mar/31/1m31juvenile01921-parents-contempt-jailings-struck/?uniontribReceived on Wed Apr 01 2009 - 12:04:30 CDT