Re: Nothing like an ORA 600 in the middle of a recover database eh?

From: Palooka <nobody_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:55:07 +0000
Message-ID: <JDXvl.152217$Hk2.2288_at_newsfe22.ams2>



hpuxrac wrote:
> Nasty bug in 64 bit 11.1.0.7 ... ( we are running OEL 5.1 ).
>
> So you are in the middle of a recover database and forward recovering
> with archive logs ... then you see this:
>
> ORA-00279: change 568074198 generated at 03/13/2009 10:47:27 needed
> for thread 1
> ORA-00289: suggestion :
> /u02prod/archivelogs/archivelog_prod_1_2484_655753279.log
> ORA-00280: change 568074198 for thread 1 is in sequence #2484
> ORA-00278: log file '/u02prod/archivelogs/
> archivelog_prod_1_2483_655753279.log'
> no longer needed for this recovery
>
> ORA-00283: recovery session canceled due to errors
> ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krr_init_lbufs_1], [74],
> [66],
> [43], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
> ORA-01112: media recovery not started
>
> Only 1 hit in metalink but fortunately a documented bypass ( from bug
> 7373196 evidently ).
>
> Bypass was documented as:
>
> So set this parameter to 4194304 (ie 4Mb) in the init.ora/spfile
> then that should be good enough to
> function as a workaround and allow recovery.
> _max_io_size=4194304
>
> *** It did work but man what a mess. Set the _max_io_size before
> doing the forward recovery then you better get rid of it before
> running normal workloads.
>
> Supposed to be fixed in 11.2 ... ( and perhaps next 11.1 patchset? ).

Wow. Horrible. I hope you were testing, rather than doing it in anger.

Palooka Received on Tue Mar 17 2009 - 19:55:07 CDT

Original text of this message