Re: ASM and IBM SVC
From: hpuxrac <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <74cefafb-4ee3-41c9-93ad-666fae13c262@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <74cefafb-4ee3-41c9-93ad-666fae13c262@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On Dec 13, 9:26 pm, Michael Austin <maus..._at_firstdbasource.com> wrote:
> Can anyone share performance impressions when using ASM with SVC or even
> 9i(yeah we know...) cooked file systems?
>
> We currently have the impression that SVC can only return data in 32k
> chunks regardless of I/O setting at the OS (Solaris, AIX and HPUX) and
> or storage parameters in Oracle causing additional I/O traffic.
>
> Just curious.
Back in my old IBM days SVC was a SuperVisor Call ... what are you talking about exactly?
Is this some kind of storage? ( We are an EMC shop ... so no clue ). Received on Sun Dec 14 2008 - 17:37:56 CST