Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?

From: Uwe Weber <uwe.weber_at_teleos-web.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:23:25 +0200
Message-ID: <6ilcboFredq2U2@mid.individual.net>

sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl wrote:

>
> Obviously, not using RAC, you won't have any load balancing and
> transparent application failover.
> You also don't have the option of cross instance recovery (instance 2
> helps instance 1 in recovery).

Of course not. Everything I know about Oracle on HACMP is from an environment where they introduced HACMP back in ORA 7 days and slowly started to migrate to RAC during their migration to 10g.
>
> Consequently I don't understand why you see this as a viable solution.

Where did I say that? But if the OP ist stuck with this anyway, I might as well give him some info about it. I am not into RAC sales.

Regards,
uwe Received on Mon Sep 08 2008 - 14:23:25 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: hpuxrac: "Re: design question"
Previous message: nkamkar28_at_gmail.com: "Problem with offline restore of a database"
In reply to: sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl: "Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?"
Next in thread: Palooka: "Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?"
Reply: Palooka: "Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message