Re: NATIONAL CHARACTERSET

From: Pete L <pmlewis_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8dd89e8f-312a-4edf-8ad8-45df544959bb@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>


QED On Aug 1, 6:24 am, sybra..._at_hccnet.nl wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:12:14 -0700 (PDT), Pete L <pmle..._at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Fair enough. No individual actually *has* to reply to questions, so if
> >one chooses to
> >do so then surely they should endeavour to do so with courtesy and
> >tact.
>
> Strangely enough YOU couldn't be bothered to post a reply with
> 'courtesy and tact', but you could be bothered to start flaming away.
> I usually consider this to be the atittude of a HYPOCRITE: Too lazy to
> share the burden of responding to RTFM question, but still willing to
> use energy and 'wear the keyboard' to FLAME those  few people who
> actually do respond to those RTFM questions.
> As far as I am concerned, your attitude, 'sir', is way more disgusting
> than mine. At least I contribute something useful, and as far as I
> recall I started in 1996 doing so. You only contribute flames.
>
> Sybrand Bakker
> Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Fri Aug 01 2008 - 03:17:38 CDT

Original text of this message