Re: create database fatal error

From: Arch <send.no_at_spam.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:00:35 -0400
Message-ID: <646v64danb234mcfosmmingar1qgireqh8@4ax.com>


On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:34:30 +0100, Tommy Halsbrekk <tommy_at_dummy.no> wrote:

>Arch wrote:
>>
>> What you haven't posted is the reason why you choose to not use the
>> Oracle DBCA in the first place.
>
>I have not chosen anything, I have been asked to fix a legacy script
>that is part of the installation procedure of an internal system.

Choosing not to use DBCA is a choice regardless of the reason. You didn't bother posting your reason.

>
>> Nor have you posted why, when Sybrand informed you that the script
>> that you originally posted was way short of adequate space for SYSTEM,
>> you posted a code snippet from some template script. What does one
>> have to do with the other? Why did you not modify your original
>> script? Where did you original script come from?
>
>The script is my template script, not "some template".

What kind of a moronic statement is that?

> Its the command I
>issue to do the job, after a perlsscript has modified some variables in
>CAPITAL LETTERS. So if you compared the script I posted in the original
>post and in the later post you would see I have incrteased the size
>parameter, which I thought was the solution to the SYSTEM space problem.
>
>Please check all posting I have made about the matter before you ask
>questions that are already answered (That is a general tip to anyone who
>uses usenet, there are far too many people who cant be bothered to read
>all posts, and get a complete picture of the discussion, before they reply)

[snip]

Read your own postings. Those questions were not answered. You act as though this is some sort of a game to see if others can figure out what you are doing without you telling them. I don't know whether it is the result of arrogance or stupidity but it is certainly rude and inconsiderate. Received on Sat Jul 05 2008 - 11:00:35 CDT

Original text of this message