Re: Parallel execution strategy
From: <vitalisman_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1a155155-aca8-4196-ab47-0c8ee67cd5f8@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1a155155-aca8-4196-ab47-0c8ee67cd5f8@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
On 18 mar, 21:51, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I can confirm that (but don't ask the details - it's been 3 years
> since I last visited that customer); iirc, reversing the order of
> naming the tables did the trick in some cases; other needed hints.
Thanks for sharing that. My conclusion is that the only guideline remains testing each query separately as I have done so far.
> I understand that might be difficult to realize (since there are
> 'suppliers' - suspect you meant software suppliers?)
Mostly hardware and storage vendors. Received on Tue Mar 18 2008 - 16:32:44 CDT