why does 11g plsql_code_type default to interpreted?
From: hpuxrac <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 06:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8e57c34f-c983-461e-8de0-6c78f2cf1926@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 06:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8e57c34f-c983-461e-8de0-6c78f2cf1926@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
I have a test system running 11g 64 bit on OEL 4. Created a new
database ( custom ... not from template with pre-suppplied
datafiles ).
It seems kind of curious that oracle is defaulting plsql_code_type to interpreted.
If the native is so much faster ... and you don't need a compiler/etc anymore ... why is this happening for a new database?
Are there a bunch of bugs and caveats that are still being experienced in this area? Maybe this default will eventually change by 11.2? Received on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 08:46:10 CST