Re: programming buzz
From: Ed Prochak <edprochak_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8efbe1ea-666e-4166-b9ad-c9433491ef8a@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8efbe1ea-666e-4166-b9ad-c9433491ef8a@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Dec 23 2007, 6:24 pm, hpuxrac <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 9:17 am, Mark D Powell <Mark.Pow..._at_eds.com> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> > spamming should be a death penalty crime.
>
> If it looks like spam and has less words in the content than the
> signature ... is that your criteria?
In a discussion group like this,
a post which does not ask or answer a question fails my first test
for useful, on-topic posts.
And if the content is only an http address, then it clearly fails any
useful information test.
So I would agree the start of this thread is spam. Ed Received on Wed Jan 02 2008 - 14:35:21 CST