Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is this a bug?

Re: Is this a bug?

From: Jim Smith <usenet_at_ponder-stibbons.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:18:55 +0000
Message-ID: <wRXSIgZPzQnFFwxk@jimsmith.demon.co.uk>


In message <1167866459.800948_at_bubbleator.drizzle.com>, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> writes
>EscVector wrote:
>> Anurag Varma wrote:
>>> EscVector wrote:
>>>> As demonstrated below, a table can be created with data type
>>>> "timestamp" as a column name.
>>>>
>>>> This causes a subsequent issue when creating triggers.
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't the table create throw a "ORA-00904: : invalid identifier"
>>>> error?
>>>>
>I'm not quite sure I can agree that something violating Oracle's advice,
>and generating an error, is a bug. At least not as long as the word
>TIMESTAMP is present in gv$reserved_words.

The "bug" is that it *isn't* generating an error.

-- 
Jim Smith
Ponder Stibbons Limited <http://oracleandting.blogspot.com/>
RSS <http://oracleandting.blogspot.com/atom.xml>
Received on Thu Jan 04 2007 - 08:18:55 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US