Re: 10g RAC and SRDF

DA Morgan wrote:
> hpuxrac wrote:
>
> > Do you really want oracle to provide the clustering layer? Many people
> > would like to at least have a choice of using vendor provided or taking
> > an oracle pieces/part.
> >
> > In 10g though CRS is mandatory for RAC.
>
> You just answered your own question. What you want is irrelevant. If
> you want TAF or FCF you must use the Oracle layer.
>
> But what's the big deal about whether Oracle provides A and someone
> else provides B and C or Oracle provides A and B and someone else
> provides C. If you are afraid of lock-in put your data on 3x5 cards.
> Otherwise you have no choice but to put your data into someone's
> bucket. And then the fewer fingers in that bucket the more likely it
> will be stable and supported.

It wasn't a question. Did you see a question mark on it?

What's the point in responding if you don't include any relevant information and you are just repeating back oracle marketing mantra's?

Let me guess. Next you are going to tell everyone to drop the dba role or maybe migrate production systems to RAC on os/x.

Where's the value add? Received on Thu Oct 05 2006 - 06:18:17 CDT