Re: 10g RAC and SRDF

From: Talat <talat.asghar_at_uk.bnpparibas.com>
Date: 28 Sep 2006 03:05:45 -0700
Message-ID: <1159437945.248295.198240@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>

>
> I'd recommend not trying to layer one failover solution on top of
> another. What is it you think you will get from HACMP you won't get
> from RAC and Data Guard?
>

HACMP is needed since we're using raw devices. SRDF is the preferred option for all mission critical production systems and hence Dataguard is not an option.

All I'm trying to determine is how other people have worked around the CRS hostname issue with SRDF. I'm beginning to think that not replicating the binaries and OCR will be a reasonable option and hopefully will work.

Thanks,

T. Received on Thu Sep 28 2006 - 05:05:45 CDT