Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 10g ASM Pros and Cons
On 2006-04-03, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote:
> JEDIDIAH wrote: >> On 2006-04-03, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote:
>> >> That statement simply boggles the mind. >> >> The typical LVM doesn't cut you off from standard filesystem >> level tools like ASM does. The typical LVM doesn't attempt to replace >> the fileystem layer of an OS entirely. They just present a complex >> disk device to the system as a simple one. >> >> This makes your points 4 & 5 untrue in practice. >> >> ASM is basically a replacement for Oracle raw disks. > > Why and how can it boggle the mind? ASM is for use on block devices. > There is no file system. There is no file system to cut you off from. Thus the fundemental divergence of ASM versus LVM solutions. > One of us is missing something here and I'm not sure which of us it > is. What you referring to with ASM that has anything to do with files? > > You state: "ASM is basically a replacement for Oracle raw disks."> Oracle has never had raw disks ... operating systems have disks > without file systems. Again I am confused as to what you are thinking.
Not surprising really. You seem to confuse easily.
-- Apple: Because a large harddrive is for power users. ||| / | \ Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.comReceived on Tue Apr 04 2006 - 11:42:19 CDT