Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Hardware Replication vs DataGuard

Re: Hardware Replication vs DataGuard

From: Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:42:07 GMT
Message-ID: <PoJkf.40133$u43.29418@twister.nyc.rr.com>

"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message news:1133727356.397234_at_jetspin.drizzle.com...
> Rodrick Brown wrote:
>> Putting costs aside what do most people think about using hardware san
>> replication technologies like SRDF/Truecopy etc.. for replicating Oracle
>> volumes at a block level to a remote instance of Oracle ? vs using
>> something like dataguard, I know dataguard allows you to have read only
>> access to that data which I think is its biggest plus, but for disaster
>> recovery reasons only what would be a better solution.
>
> How does one put cost aside? It is substantial.
>

Well given the fact that the storage infrastructure between datacenters are already in place (paid for) and dataguard is free i'm looking for a answer based on the technology options only.

-- 

> Daniel A. Morgan
> http://www.psoug.org
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
Received on Sun Dec 04 2005 - 15:42:07 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US