Re: Large table monthly switch design problem

schonlinner_at_yahoo.com wrote:

>As mentioned before: I tested it using a view which then contained
>a union all over 24 tables containing the monthly data. But the
>performance was round about 3 times slower.

<SARCASM>
I'd say that really has your server humming. A UNION over 24 tables... </SARCASM>

Paul...

> Martin

-- 

plinehan __at__ yahoo __dot__ __com__

XP Pro, SP 2, 

Oracle, 9.2.0.1.0 (Enterprise Ed.)
Interbase 6.0.1.0=6;

When asking database related questions, please give other posters 
some clues, like operating system, version of db being used and DDL.
The exact text and/or number of error messages is useful (!= "it didn't work!").
Thanks.
 
Furthermore, As a courtesy to those who spend 
time analysing and attempting to help, please 
do not top post.