Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Performance difference between 2 machines

Re: Performance difference between 2 machines

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:05:25 -0700
Message-ID: <1119589538.719543@yasure>


Noons wrote:
> DA Morgan wrote:
>

>>But why not just move everything to RAW and ASM?
>>
>>I've seen no problems with in on RH 3.
>>--

>
>
> Because there is a limit on the number of raw
> devices one can open in RH3 and I'm w-a-a-a-y
> over that already in my db servers.
>
> And because I can't convince my management to
> buy upfront all the disk storage we may need
> for the next 5 years. It changes so much in price
> as time goes by, anyone buying more than 12 months
> ahead is basically throwing away good moolah.
>
> Therefore I have to live with adding space to existing
> dbs as time and needs come by.
> ALTER DATABASE DATAFILE '/dev/blah' RESIZE 40000M
> ain't work well when /dev/blah is raw. The alternative
> of changing via lvm ain't work either if you're 24X7!
>
> And don't get me started on how many raw devices
> I need to run my redos!
>
> Apple's XSERVE raids have been a Godsend: good
> performance even in cooked IO, cheap, large.
> But even these have limits.
>
> All I need is ONE 9irn that works well...

Take a bunch of disks.
Stripe them.
Present them as a single LUN.
One raw device.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Fri Jun 24 2005 - 00:05:25 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US