Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Grid

Re: Oracle Grid

From: Mark A <nobody_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:00:57 -0600
Message-ID: <-c-dnWntiNaVSDPfRVn-og@comcast.com>


"Shabble" <gbarbour_at_baesystemsdotcom> wrote in message news:42ae9a1e$1_1_at_glkas0286.greenlnk.net...
>> GRID and RAC are two totally different things with little or no
> relationship to each other.
>> ******************************************************************
>>
>> Regarding past statements about GRID (I read the old threads), I got the
>> impression this a new and/or improved version of GRID.
>>
> I think it unlikely that any impression you get, is going to influence
> anybody.
> Did you actually read Daniel's comments?
> Your supposition was hit with a very heavy hammer.
> Shabble.
>

Yes, I read Daniel's comments. An impression is not a supposition. No one has answered my questions.

What are the recommendations for using RAC vs GRID (or both) for continuous availability? The TV ad did not mention RAC at all, only GRID. Received on Tue Jun 14 2005 - 08:00:57 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US