DA Morgan wrote:
> Serge Rielau wrote:
>
>> DA Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> dbguy456_at_yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Wrong results are even worse than a crash. At least a crash can't be
>>>> missed.
>>>> Sure they are worse. But my point here was that while incompetent DBA
>>>> can be blamed for invlaid results (well, at least in some cases), but
>>>> it is wrong to blame him for instance crash.
>>> Sorry but I'm not buying that. Instance crashes are most often caused
>>> by DBAs. And unless you are looking at ORA-00600 I'm sticking to it. ;-)
>> Perhaps DB2 DBAs have different expectations then.
> You mean buggy product releases?
> I don't think so. Seems to be a new "feature" with 8.2.
If the new feature is to accept a downed instance as a bug no matter
what the poster did short of actual sabotage,
then yes. That would actually be an old feature and I'll wear that badge
with stride.
Playing the blame game with a customer, happy or not, is always a bad idea.
Cheers
Serge
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 SQL Compiler Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Received on Wed May 18 2005 - 17:51:37 CDT
