Re: Archiver question

From: zhu chao <zhuchao_at_gmail.com>
Date: 27 Apr 2005 23:59:36 -0700
Message-ID: <962cf44b.0504272259.287ce9d7@posting.google.com>

"Joel Garry" <joel-garry_at_home.com> wrote in message news:<1114105599.699424.254430_at_z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>...
> chao_ping wrote:
> > OK, to summarize it, since the whole post is a little lengthy.
> > >From lsof result, you can see file handle 12 is is the first member.
> > >From strace result, you can see all the read from the logfile is
> from
> > file handle 12, which is the first member.
> > Other pread only read 8192 blocks, maybe only the header.
> >
> > Yong Huang provide the suggestions to do the test and we verified it.
> > Not all the meatlink notes are correct. Some can be wrong. Not all
> the
> > words the experts said are correct, some can be out of date:)
>
> Thanks guys, that is good to know. Obviously, O8 changed the archiving
> greatly. It will take a day or two for me to go through the
> registration rigamarole at that site, so I'll ask here: Did you test
> multiple archiver processes under severe load?
>
> jg

Ok, how do you define severe load? When the archiver can't catch up? One logfile sequence is always only archived by one archive process. So do you think multiple archive process will make any difference?

Did you do some test to verify it yourself? Received on Thu Apr 28 2005 - 01:59:36 CDT