Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: DB2 UDB or Oracle (who has better support)

Re: DB2 UDB or Oracle (who has better support)

From: Mark A <nobody_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:20:18 -0700
Message-ID: <_r6dnRStPZ5MKrrfRVn-qQ@comcast.com>


"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:1109898324.120008_at_yasure...
> Always the same. I can take a PL/SQL package written on *NIX and
> run it on anything from a mainframe to Windows to a Mac and no code
> change is required. Export from any one and import into any other.
> Transport a tablespace from any one and attach it to any other.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan

Yes, always the same SQL and operational commands for DB2 for Linux, UNIX (AIX, Solaris, HP/UX), and Windows.

The only difference is that one must change the file name syntax between Windows and other operating systems since Windows has drive letters (C:\, D:\, etc.) and Windows uses back-slashes instead of forward slashes. This only applies to situations where you need to tell DB2 about specific file names or directory paths, such as where to place a tablespace container, where a backup should be placed, etc. Received on Thu Mar 03 2005 - 19:20:18 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US