Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Sun ZFS vs. Oracle ASM

Sun ZFS vs. Oracle ASM

From: Vikas Agnihotri <usenet_at_vikas.mailshell.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:03:50 -0500
Message-ID: <358ombF4iks6aU1@individual.net>


Refer to

http://www.sun.com/2004-0914/feature/index.html

This sounds uncannily like the new ASM feature in Oracle 10g?

So 10g+ASM on this new ZFS filesystem would be overkill. Either use ASM with raw disks or non-ASM with ZFS?

ZFS looks like interesting technology. They seem to have made the filesystem fully transactional with almost a 2-phase commit.

The ZFS filesystem is also looking like a Oracle autoextend tablespace taking/giving back from the storage pool as necessary!

ZFS, Oracle 10g ASM, Veritas suite of products, sheesh...so many options to do essentially the same thing!

Guess we just need to wait for the inevitable industry benchmarks comparing all these?!

Thanks Received on Wed Jan 19 2005 - 22:03:50 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US