Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RAID 5 vs RAID 10 benchmark
Thank you for your comments.
I did read maybe all these papers about RAID (BAARF etc.) before
posting so I had no intention to provoke another general debate about
all the already said points again (costs, "what if" scenarios etc...).
I`m sorry that I was not exact enough about my question. What I wanted to know is that:
If a write intensive database is placed on RAID 5 and there are some performance problems due to IO, and I have this set of parameters:
Question: Will be helpful to change from RAID 5 to RAID 10 to reduce the performance problems significantly? Please note that I cannot test the impacts and it (change from RAID 5 to RAID 10) will not be without costs.
What I have up now is the only conclussions comming:
Regards, Jan
janik_at_pobox.sk (Jan) wrote in message news:<81511301.0411250222.496c1242_at_posting.google.com>...
> Several scientific (or logical) conclussions were already made about
> RAID 5
> that this is not the best option for write intensive databases. It
> seems very logical also to me when I read arguments against RAID 5.
>
> But I`m confused by following benchmark showing that it is not
> worthful anymore (at least for a tested storage) to thinks about RAID
> 5 vs RAID 10 from the performance point of view.
>
> http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/ess/pdf/raid5-raid10.pdf
>
> Jan
Received on Mon Nov 29 2004 - 02:52:21 CST