Re: Serious article on comparison between MS SQL Server 2005 Yukon and Oracle 10

Database replication via OracleMonster.com wrote:

> Daniel,
> Please describe the fact that give you more credibility over other people? Is it the one that you do not respect other people, or that you are screaming loudly? Neither one would justify it for me. If you have facts other than your talks, please provide it here. Otherwise it is just a noise. Sorry if I hurt your feelings
>
> *****************************************
> * A copy of the whole thread can be found at:
> * http://oraclemonster.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/oracle-server/5185
> *
> * Report spam or abuse by clicking the following URL:
> * http://oraclemonster.com/Uwe/Abuse.aspx?aid=220d02d5c5e9418d8a20a4fe8704516d
> *****************************************

Over other people? Do you mean to imply ALL other people or just the one's that wrote that particular inaccurate document?

Microsoft's solution is a cold failover that is equivalent to DataGuard not RAC. If you don't like that this is a fact then you have a problem that you need to address and nothing more. If you think it appropriate to compare two different technologies that do entirely different things than you also have a problem you need to address and nothing more.

That the paper is inaccurate is not a reflection upon me and I give your comments all of the consideration they are due.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)