Re: spfile vs pfile in 9i

Howard J. Rogers wrote:

> Daniel, do you seriously think I would sit here advocating that Burleson
> stay on record with fallacious crap?

For only a moment. ;-) Then rationality took hold again. Of course not!

> The concern with Burleson is that he never version-enables his works. So you
> can pick up two pieces of his work, and see that they express totally
> different opinions... with no *explanation* of what might have changed his
> mind on the matter.
>
> Burleson doesn't, in other words, research, read others and serendipitously
> come to different conclusions, updating his documents accordingly. He
> sanitised the record once he's been proved wrong, which is quite different.
>
> I doubt Don even knows the meaning of the word "acknowledgement".
>
> HJR
I think the record speaks for itself.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)